Affiliation:
1. La Trobe University
2. Prince Sultan University
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This article examines how an individual-level academic performance measurement system interacts with the collective self in a collectivist cultural context. The qualitative study of a Vietnamese public university involved 53 interviews, participant observations, and document analysis. The findings show that performance measurement systems in the university produced both an autonomous self and a collective self. They do so by measuring individual performance and suggesting that individuals are autonomously responsible and able to influence such performance. Thus, although a performance measurement system is typically imposed by others (which shows one’s dependence on others and subjection to their power), the nature of the performance measurement system is such that it promotes individual actions and a sense of individual performance. Therefore, people feel they have control over “their” performance. However, while trying to control such performance, they depend more on others whose recognition appears to link with such performance measurement systems.
Data Availability: Data are not available for confidentiality reasons.
JEL Classifications: I2; M41; M48; P2.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Accounting
Reference44 articles.
1. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity;Ball;Journal of Education Policy,2003
2. The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization;Barrett;Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,2017
3. Academics as intellectuals;Barnett;Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,2003
4. Sense of self: Its place in personality disturbance, psychopathology, and normal experience;Basten;Review of General Psychology,2020