Monitors or Predators: The Influence of Institutional Investors on Sell-Side Analysts

Author:

Gu Zhaoyang1,Li Zengquan2,Yang Yong George3

Affiliation:

1. University of Minnesota

2. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

3. Chinese University of Hong Kong

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Regulators and the investment community have been concerned that institutional investors pressure financial analysts through trading commission fees to issue optimistic opinions in support of their stock positions. We use a unique dataset that identifies mutual fund companies' allocation of trading commission fees to individual brokerages and provide direct evidence on this issue. In particular, we show that for stocks in which the fund companies have taken large positions, analysts are more optimistic in their stock recommendations when their brokerages receive trading commission fees from these fund companies. The relationship is stronger when the commission fee pressure is greater. The market reacts less favorably to the “Strong Buy” recommendations of analysts facing greater commission fee pressure. The funds also respond negatively to such recommendations in making portfolio adjustments. These results point to a source of analyst bias that has been little explored in the literature. Data Availability: The data are publically available from the sources identified in the paper.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference42 articles.

1. Do analyst conflicts matter? Evidence from stock recommendations;Agrawal;Journal of Law and Economics,2008

2. The reward to meeting or beating earnings expectations;Bartov;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2002

3. Boni, L., and K. Womack. 2003 . Solving the Sell-Side Research Problem: Insights from Buy-Side Professionals . Working paper , Dartmouth College .

4. Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility;Bushee;Journal of Accounting Research,2000

5. China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) . 1997 . Interim Measures for the Administration of Securities and Futures Investment Consultancy. Rules No. 21 and 25 . Beijing, PRC : CSRC .

Cited by 140 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Bright Side of Analyst Coverage: Evidence from Stock Price Resilience during COVID-19;Research in International Business and Finance;2024-09

2. The Effect of Analysts’ Reports on Stock Liquidity: The Interaction of Ratings and Qualitative Indicators;Journal of Behavioral Finance;2024-08-16

3. Political incentives and analyst bias: Evidence from China;Contemporary Accounting Research;2024-06-10

4. Under the dome: Air pollution and analyst forecast optimism;Research in International Business and Finance;2024-06

5. Sustainable development goals disclosure and analyst forecast quality;Journal of Applied Accounting Research;2024-05-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3