Affiliation:
1. George Washington University.
2. Boston College.
Abstract
Analysis in this study demonstrates how differences in strategy can be incorporated into evaluations and comparisons of financial statements of charitable organizations. The ratio of program spending to total spending, a metric commonly used in practice to evaluate charities, is the focus of the analysis. Our approach involves classifying charities according to how they access markets for donated resources and then using regression analysis to predict an organization's program-spending ratio, given the organization's strategic choice, size, and charitable objective. We then compare the predicted ratio to the organization's actual ratio to identify candidates for further review and investigation. In doing so, this paper illustrates how considering strategic choice enhances the analysis of financial statements of charitable organizations and informs assessments of organization effectiveness.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference33 articles.
1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1987. Accounting for Joint Costs of Informational Materials and Activities of Not-for-Profit Organizations that Include a Fund-Raising Appeal. Statement of Position No. 87-2. New York, NY: AICPA.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).1998. Accounting for Costs of Activities of Not-for-Profit Organizations and State and Local Entities that Include Fund Raising. Statement of Position No. 98-2. New York, NY: AICPA.
3. Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence
4. Barrett, W. 1999. Look before you give. Forbes (December 27): 206-214.
5. Becker, G. 1974. A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy 82-6 (December): 1063-1091.
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献