The Effects of Time Pressure on Belief Revision in Accounting: A Review of Relevant Literature within a Pressure-Arousal-Effort-Performance Framework

Author:

Pietsch Christian P. R.1,Messier William F.23

Affiliation:

1. Saint Mary's University

2. University of Nevada, Las Vegas

3. NHH Norwegian School of Economics

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study advances several propositions about the effects of time pressure on individuals' belief revisions within a pressure-arousal-effort-performance framework. There is a significant body of research that documents the importance of both time pressure and order effects in an accounting environment. However, prior research has not investigated how the order of information affects individuals' belief revision processes under varying levels of time pressure, even though the inclusion of a time pressure variable has been noted as relevant in belief revision research, both in general (Hogarth and Einhorn 1992) and in accounting (Kahle, Pinsker, and Pennington 2005; Trotman and Wright 2000). In this review, we extend prior belief revision research in accounting by describing how time pressure interacts with personal and task variables and the subprocesses described in the belief-adjustment model (Hogarth and Einhorn 1992). Propositions are advanced on the effects of time pressure on individuals' belief revisions. A better understanding of such interactive effects helps to explain the mixed results identified in prior studies.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Accounting

Reference138 articles.

1. How do audit workpaper reviewers cope with the conflicting pressures of detecting misstatements and balancing client workloads?;Agoglia;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2010

2. Order effects and memory for evidence in individual versus group decision making in auditing;Ahlawat;Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,1999

3. Auditors' perceptions of time budget pressures and premature sign-offs: A replication and extension;Alderman;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,1982

4. Primacy effects and the role of risk in auditor belief-revision processes;Anderson;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,1999

5. Test of a model for opinion change;Anderson;Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,1959

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3