Affiliation:
1. Washington State University
2. Southern Utah University
Abstract
ABSTRACT
We examine the effect of campaign financial disclosures on support for Washington State Initiative 1634, a ballot initiative aimed at limiting tax increases on soda. In an experimental setting, we assess the effect of financial disclosures when paired with the actual textual arguments provided to Washington State voters and the effect of financial disclosures when paired with more complementary textual arguments. We find evidence that financial disclosures influence changes in voter support for the tax initiative. Specifically, our findings indicate that disclosing the top financial contributors “for” and “against” the initiative provides decision-relevant information to voters. Thus, policymakers should consider (1) making donor disclosures freely available in voter information guides, (2) eliminating special-interest group techniques that hide the sources of contributions, and (3) erring on the side of caution when constituents seek to remove ballot-related financial reporting requirements.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference28 articles.
1. Beverage industry, allies start campaign to stop spread of Seattle’s soda tax;Beekman;Seattle Times,2018
2. Making sense of issues through media frames: Understanding the Kosovo crisis;Berinsky;The Journal of Politics,2006
3. The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature;Beyer;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010
4. Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning;Brady;American Political Science Review,1985
5. You want to spend my money how? Framing effects on tax increases via ballot propositions;Braidwood;State Politics & Policy Quarterly,2019