Abstract
ABSTRACT
This article develops a theory of standard-setting in which accounting standards emerge endogenously from an institutional bargaining process. It provides a unified framework with investment and voluntary disclosure to examine the links between regulatory institutions and accounting choice. We show that disclosure rules tend to be more comprehensive when controlled by a self-regulated professional organization than when they are under the direct oversight of elected politicians. These institutions may not implement standards desirable to diversified investors and, when voluntary disclosures are possible, allowing choice between competing standards increases market value over a single uniform standard. Several new testable hypotheses are also offered to explain differences in accounting regulations.
JEL Classifications: C78; D02; D04; D71; D72; D79; G28; L51; M41; M48.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. Towards an understanding of the role of standard setters in standard setting;Allen;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2012
2. Strategic behavior and regulation research in accounting;Amershi;Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,1982
3. Bargaining in legislatures;Baron;American Political Science Review,1989
4. Accounting is an evolved economic institution;Basu;Foundations and Trends in Accounting,2008
5. Congress looks at accounting for business combinations;Beresford;Accounting Horizons,2001
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献