Affiliation:
1. The University of Texas at Dallas
2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Abstract
ABSTRACT:
We argue that reductions in shareholder taxes should lower the cost of equity capital more for financially constrained firms than for other companies. Consistent with this prediction, we find that, following the 1997 (TRA) and the 2003 (JGTRRA) cuts in U.S. individual shareholder taxes, financially constrained firms enjoyed larger reductions in their cost of equity capital than did other firms. The results are consistent with the incidence of the tax reductions falling mostly on firms with both pressing needs for capital and disproportionate ownership by individuals, the only shareholders who benefited from the legislations. The paper provides a partial explanation for the seemingly puzzling finding that, following the unprecedented 2003 reduction in dividend tax rates, non-dividend-paying firms outperformed dividend-paying firms. The results suggest that it was not dividend status that mattered, but financial constraint, a common attribute of non-dividend-paying companies.
Data Availability: Data are available from public sources identified in the study.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference36 articles.
1. The 2003 dividend tax cuts and the value of the firm: An event study;Auerbach;Taxing Corporate Income in the 21st Century,2006
2. Dividends, share repurchases, and tax clienteles: Evidence from the 2003 reductions in shareholder taxes;Blouin;The Accounting Review,2011
3. Executive financial incentives and payout policy: Firm responses to the 2003 dividend tax cut;Brown;Journal of Finance,2007
4. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior;Bushee;The Accounting Review,1998
5. The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors;Campbell;Review of Financial Studies,1988
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献