Abstract
ABSTRACT
We study intertemporal incentive properties of conditional accounting conservatism. Conservatism has detrimental and beneficial properties. In our first model, conservatism introduces downward bias in the first period; any understatement of first-period performance is reversed in the second period. A conservative bias is not costly in the first period but instead is costly in the second period when a new manager may be rewarded for the performance of his predecessor. In an extension on learning, we illustrate a beneficial role of conservatism in fine-tuning incentives. In the second model, conservatism is modeled as recognizing effort-independent bad news early and good news late. Recognizing bad news early can be optimal because of intertemporal rent shifting, which improves incentives via an “incentive spillback.” We also study overlapping projects (a multi-task setting) in which an interior accounting system can be optimal to avoid making one of the overlapping projects an incentive bottleneck.
JEL Classifications: D21; D74; D82; D86.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference36 articles.
1. Performance measurement manipulation: Cherry-picking what to correct;Arya;Review of Accounting Studies,2008
2. Earnings management and the revelation principle;Arya;Review of Accounting Studies,1998
3. Conservative accounting choices;Bagnoli;Management Science,2005
4. Basu, S.
1995. Conservatism and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester.
5. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings;Basu;Journal of Accounting and Economics,1997
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献