Evidence on Internal Audit Quality from Transitioning to Remote Audits because of COVID-19

Author:

Eulerich Marc1ORCID,Wagener Martin1ORCID,Wood David A.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Duisburg-Essen

2. Brigham Young University

Abstract

ABSTRACT As in-person audits were banned by governments and by company policies due to the COVID-19 pandemic, internal auditors had to transition to remote audits to perform their work. Based on survey responses of internal auditors who have conducted both remote and in-person audits, we find that internal auditors perceive no difference in the efficiency and effectiveness of and stakeholders' reliance on results from remote and in-person audits when considering all responses. However, we also find that perceived efficiency and effectiveness increase the more experience internal auditors have with remote audits. Supplemental analyses show that support from the auditee, but not management or the audit committee, is a central determinant of perceived remote audit success. It is important for internal auditors to consider this later finding in the design of remote audits as it indicates the importance of building support with the auditee to have a successful remote auditing experience. Data Availability: Please contact the authors. JEL Classifications: M40; M42; G3; G34.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Human-Computer Interaction,Accounting,Information Systems,Software,Management Information Systems

Reference63 articles.

1. Abbott, L. J., Daugherty B., Parker S., and PetersG. F.. 2016. Internal audit quality and financial reporting quality: The joint importance of independence and competence. Journal of Accounting Research54 ( 1): 3– 40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12099

2. Bartlett, G. D., Kremin J., Saunders K. K., and WoodD. A.. 2016. Attracting applicants for in-house and outsourced internal audit positions: Views from external auditors. Accounting Horizons30 ( 1): 143– 156. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51309

3. Bartlett, G. D., Kremin J., Saunders K. K., and WoodD. A.. 2017. Factors influencing recruitment of non-accounting business professionals into internal auditing. Behavioral Research in Accounting29 ( 1): 119– 130. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51643

4. Bennett, A. A., Campion E. D., Keeler K. R., and KeenerS. K.. 2021. Videoconference fatigue? Exploring changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during COVID-19. The Journal of Applied Psychology106 ( 3): 330– 344. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000906

5. Bennett, G. B., and HatfieldR. C.. 2018. Staff auditors' proclivity for computer-mediated communication with clients and its effect on skeptical behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society68–69: 42– 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.003

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3