Internal Auditors’ Perceptions of Information Technology-Related Risks: A Comparison Between General Auditors and Information Technology Auditors

Author:

Nuijten Arno L. P.12ORCID,Keil Mark3,Zwiers Bert1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Erasmus University Rotterdam

2. The Open University

3. Georgia State University

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the growing role of information technology (IT), many organizations have incorporated IT governance practices that include keeping executives apprised of IT risks. To perform this function, organizations rely upon their internal audit staff to obtain an independent evaluation of IT risks. Although both general and IT auditors are involved in assessing IT risks, they may not be equally adept at identifying such risks. We draw on the expert versus nonexpert perspective to understand how general and IT auditors perceive IT risks differently. Through a quasi experiment with 70 internal auditors of a financial institution, we found that general auditors perceived IT risks to be lower than their IT audit colleagues. We also found that personal IT risk preferences influenced the level of IT risks that general auditors perceived. Personal IT risk preferences did not affect the risk perceptions of IT auditors. Implications for both research and practice are discussed.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Human-Computer Interaction,Accounting,Information Systems,Software,Management Information Systems

Reference50 articles.

1. Toward an assessment of software development risk;Barki;Journal of Management Information Systems,1993

2. Incident-centered information security: Managing a strategic balance between prevention and response;Baskerville;Information & Management,2014

3. Expertise and its relation to audit decision quality;Bédard;Contemporary Accounting Research,1991

4. Information systems risk and audit planning;Bedard;International Journal of Auditing,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3