The Strength of Performance Incentives, Pay Dispersion, and Lower-Paid Employee Effort

Author:

Brown Conor V. C.1,Evans John Harry2,Moser Donald V.2,Presslee Adam3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Grand Valley State University

2. University of Pittsburgh

3. University of Waterloo

Abstract

ABSTRACT The strength of performance incentives differs for employees within an organization. We describe how differences in incentive strength can lead to pay dispersion because employees facing stronger incentives work harder and earn more pay than those facing weaker incentives. We then conduct four experiments examining how the lower-paid employees respond to such pay dispersion. Consistent with our hypothesis derived from referent cognitions theory, we find that such pay dispersion decreases the lower-paid employees' perceived fairness and thus their effort. These results hold whether the employees are assigned to or self-select into the job with weaker incentives and whether they have more explicit or less explicit information about the economic rationale for the difference in incentive strength. Our findings are inconsistent with conventional economic reasoning and refine the conclusions from prior pay dispersion studies. The robustness of our results demonstrates their generalizability to a range of actual employment settings. Data Availability: Data and experimental instruments are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M41; M52; M55.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference55 articles.

1. Ambrose, M. L., and KulikC. T. 1988. Referent sharing: Convergence within workgroups of perceptions of equity and referent choice. Human Relations41 ( 9): 697– 707. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678804100904

2. Ambrose, M. L., Harland L. K., and KulikC. T. 1991. Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness. The Journal of Applied Psychology76 ( 2): 239– 246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.239

3. Baiman, S. 1990. Agency research in managerial accounting: A second look. Accounting, Organizations and Society15 ( 4): 341– 371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90023-N

4. Baker, G. P. 1992. Incentive contracts and performance measurement. Journal of Political Economy100 ( 3): 598– 614. https://doi.org/10.1086/261831

5. Baltagi, B. H. 2008. A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3