Affiliation:
1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2. University of Siegen
3. Johannes Kepler University Linz
4. IMC Krems University of Applied Sciences
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Research on enterprise risk management (ERM) has increased considerably in the past two decades. Although management accounting researchers have substantially contributed to these advancements, previous reviews of the ERM literature have not discussed in depth the role of ERM as part of the organizational control package and how management accounting research could build on its research traditions to further our collective understanding of ERM. In this paper, we therefore adopt a management control perspective to critically analyze both quantitative and qualitative empirical ERM research and specifically focus on the integration of ERM in organizational control packages. Taking a complementarity perspective and accounting for the decision-facilitating and decision-influencing purposes of management accounting and control systems (MACS), we recommend several broader avenues for future management accounting research on ERM.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference135 articles.
1. Critique on the “manager effects” research and implications for management accounting research;Abernethy,;Journal of Management Accounting Research,2019
2. Shades of grey: Guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies;Adams,;International Journal of Management Reviews,2017
3. Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis;Aebi,;Journal of Banking & Finance,2012
4. Cognitive risk culture and advanced roles of actors in risk governance: A case study;Agarwal,;The Journal of Risk Finance,2018
5. Enterprise risk management literature: Emerging themes and future directions;Ahmad Jaber,;Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change,2023
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献