Tax Boycotts

Author:

Asay H. Scott1,Hoopes Jeffrey L.2,Thornock Jacob R.3ORCID,Wilde Jaron H.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Iowa

2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

3. Brigham Young University

Abstract

ABSTRACT To what extent do U.S. consumers change their purchase behavior or, in the extreme, boycott companies based on negative information about corporate tax activities? Practitioner publications and academic research identify consumers as a key corporate tax stakeholder. But we have limited empirical evidence whether information about corporate tax activities influences consumer actions. We undertake a comprehensive study of this question, triangulating across several settings. First, a representative sample of consumers suggests they rarely boycott in response to corporate tax activities. Next, an analysis of granular retail scanner data fails to provide compelling evidence of consumer purchase responses to negative tax news. An analysis of individual foot traffic at retail establishments around negative tax news again fails to suggest U.S. consumers change their shopping activities in response to negative tax news. The combined evidence suggests consumers do not meaningfully alter their purchase behavior in response to negative tax news. JEL Classifications: M41; M48; H25; H26.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference42 articles.

1. Tax havens and disclosure aggregation;Akamah;Journal of International Business Studies,2018

2. Causality redux: The evolution of empirical methods in accounting research and the growth of quasi-experiments;Armstrong;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2022

3. Consumer responses to corporate tax planning;Asay,2018

4. An examination of reputational costs and tax avoidance: Evidence from firms with valuable consumer brands;Austin,;Journal of the American Taxation Association,2017

5. Baker, S. R. , S. T.Sun, and C.Yannelis. 2023. Corporate taxes and retail prices. (Working paper). https://www.nber.org/papers/w27058

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3