Performance Measurement and Reward Systems, Trust, and Strategic Change

Author:

Chenhall Robert H.,Langfield-Smith Kim1

Affiliation:

1. Monash University.

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which a manufacturing company used performance measurement and a gain-sharing reward system to achieve strategic change over a 15-year period. The case examines the initial impact of the gain-sharing scheme in overcoming inherent hostility within the workforce, its continued success in gaining the cooperation of employees to work toward the successful implementation of strategic initiatives and, finally, its limitations in sustaining ongoing strategic change after a ten-year period of apparent success. The firm eventually adopted team-based structures to complement gain sharing and sustain commitment to strategic change. We explain the apparent success of the gain-sharing scheme over the first ten-year period in terms of the role of organizational trust. Gain sharing is a mechanistic form of control system, and hence may be compatible with organizational trust. After this initial success, managers believed that the level of employee cooperation to sustain strategic change was insufficient to maintain high performance in an increasingly competitive environment. The firm then introduced team-based structures to enhance employee enthusiasm to work toward sustaining strategic change. The adoption of teams promotes personal trust and the sharing of values and goals. The team-based initiatives did not result in significant performance improvements. We attribute this result, in part, to the continued role of gain sharing, a mechanistic control, which inhibited the development of personal trust.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference83 articles.

1. Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage

2. Briody, E. K., and M. L. Baba. 1994. Reconstructing a cultural clash at general motors: An historical view from the overseas assignment. In Anthropological Perspectives on Organizational Culture, edited by T. Hamada, and W. E. Sibley, 342-371. Lanham, MD: University Press of America Inc.

3. Brockner, J., and P. Siegel. 1996. Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In Trust in Organizations, edited by R. M. Kramer, and T. Tyler, 390- 413. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cited by 95 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3