The Interactive Effect of Time Pressure and Client Preference on Tax Professionals' Information Search Emphasis, Judgments, and Recommendations

Author:

Ewing Robert A.1ORCID,Spilker Brian C.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. New Mexico State University

2. Brigham Young University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tax professionals commonly search large databases of information to identify tax authority necessary to provide compliance and planning advice to clients. Prior research indicates tax professionals' information search processes are subject to confirmation bias in the direction of client preferences and that this bias can lead professionals to make overly aggressive recommendations. However, very little is known about how time pressure may affect tax professionals' judgment and decision-making processes. This study contributes to practice and to the time pressure and decision bias literatures by providing theory and evidence that increasing time pressure leads to confirmation bias during tax information search and that time pressure enhanced confirmation bias affects recommendations through professionals' assessments of the evidential support for the client-preferred position. With an understanding of how time pressure can influence confirmation bias in information search, professionals and their firms can take steps to manage time pressure and its potential biasing effects.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Finance,Accounting

Reference64 articles.

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2009. Statements on Standards for Tax Services 1–7. (Updated April 30, 2018). Available at: https://future.aicpa.org/resources/download/statements-on-standards-for-tax-services-no-1-7

2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) 2014. Code of Professional Conduct and Bylaws. (Updated through June 2019). Available at: https://pub.aicpa.org/codeofconduct/Ethics.aspx

3. Anderson, C. 1976. Coping behaviors as intervening mechanisms in the inverted-U stress performance relationship. The Journal of Applied Psychology61 ( 1): 30– 34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.1.30

4. Asare, S. K., Trompeter G. M., and WrightA. M. 2000. The effect of accountability and time budgets on auditors' testing strategies. Contemporary Accounting Research17 ( 4): 539– 560. https://doi.org/10.1506/F1EG-9EJG-DJ0B-JD32

5. Ask, K., and GranhagP. A. 2007. Motivational bias in criminal investigators' judgments of witness reliability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology37 ( 3): 561– 591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00175.x

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3