Author:
Bedard Jean C.,Falsetta Diana,Krishnamoorthy Ganesh,Omer Thomas C.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This study examines the decisions of firms to voluntarily disclose tax fees paid to their external auditors. Although the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) began requiring public companies to disclose fees paid to auditors in 2000, separate disclosure of tax service fees as a component of those fees was not required until 2003. During this period, there was increased scrutiny by the SEC on many aspects of the auditor-client relationship, and by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on the sale of tax shelters by large public accounting firms to their clients. Hence, we predict that the decisions of firms that buy tax services from their auditors to voluntarily disclose fees for those services will be significantly influenced by political costs associated with heightened regulatory scrutiny. Results show that the likelihood of separate disclosure of tax fees in 2002 is negatively associated with the ratio of nonaudit service fees (NAS) to total fees, thus supporting the political cost hypothesis. Importantly, we find that the negative association of political cost and disclosure is exacerbated by both audit committee governance and audit firm size. We also find the disclosure decision to be positively associated with agency costs (institutional ownership and size) and negatively associated with the relative amount of deferred taxes, firm profitability, and auditor change. In summary, these results shed light on the roles played by two important players in the corporate governance structure of a firm (the audit committee and the audit firm) in determining a firm’s voluntary disclosure practices.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference71 articles.
1. An empirical investigation of audit fees, nonaudit fees, and audit committees;Abbott;Contemporary Accounting Research,2003
2. Audit committee characteristics and restatements;Abbott;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2004
3. The market for “lemons:” Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism;Akerlof;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1970
4. Do NAS compromise auditor independence? Further evidence;Ashbaugh;The Accounting Review,2003
5. Corporate financial reporting: A methodological review of empirical research;Ball;Journal of Accounting Research,1982
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献