Firm Characteristics and Voluntary Management Reports on Internal Control

Author:

Bronson Scott N.1,Carcello Joseph V.2,Raghunandan K.3

Affiliation:

1. Michigan State University.

2. University of Tennessee.

3. Florida International University.

Abstract

This study provides evidence on the nature of voluntary management reports on internal control (MRIC), and on the characteristics of firms issuing such reports, before internal control reports were mandated under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We examine the association between firm characteristics and the voluntary inclusion of an MRIC in the firm's annual report. Our analysis of 397 midsized firms in 1998 indicates that a voluntary MRIC is more likely for firms that are larger, have an audit committee that meets more often, have a greater level of institutional ownership, and have more rapid income growth. We find that a voluntary MRIC is less likely for companies with more rapid sales growth. Slightly more than one-third of our sample issues an MRIC. None of the voluntary MRICs mention any material weaknesses; no reports include an auditor attestation; less than half (41 percent) of the reports include a statement that controls were effective; and only three of these reports include the criteria used to assess control effectiveness.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference38 articles.

1. Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements

2. Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies. 2006. Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Washington, D.C.

3. American Electronics Association (AEA). 2005. Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: The ``Section'' of Unintended Consequences and Its Impact on Small Business. Washington, D.C.

4. Agency Costs and Ownership Structure

5. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and W. Kinney. 2006. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Working paper, University of Wisconsin, The University of Iowa, and The University of Texas at Austin.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3