Affiliation:
1. University of Washington
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Review correspondence between the SEC and firms is a potentially valuable resource for investors, revealing important information about firms' financial reporting quality. Research suggests that reducing access costs (i.e., the amount of effort required to access review correspondence) could increase investors' processing of this important information. Drawing on psychology theory, I predict and find that access costs interact with another key characteristic within the SEC's control—review ambiguity (i.e., transparency about outcomes from the SEC's review process)—to influence investors' judgments. Results show that when access costs are low, greater review ambiguity decreases investors' reliance on review correspondence information and influences investment judgments in a corresponding manner. In contrast, review ambiguity has no effect on investors' reliance or investment judgments when access costs are high. Overall, my results provide important new insights on the importance of SEC transparency during its review process, particularly as information becomes more easily accessible.
JEL Classifications: C91; D81; D83; G11; M41.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference78 articles.
1. Acito,
A. A.,
Burks
J. J.,
and
JohnsonW. B.
2019.
The materiality of accounting errors: Evidence from SEC comment letters.
Contemporary Accounting Research36 (
2):
839–
868.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12458
2. Asay,
H. S.,
Guggenmos
R.,
Kadous
K.,
Koonce
L.,
and
LibbyR.
2019.
Theory testing and process evidence in accounting experiments.
Working paper, The University of Iowa, Cornell University, Emory University, and The University of Texas at Austin.
3. Bastardi,
A.,
and
ShafirE.
1998.
On the pursuit and misuse of useless information.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75 (
1):
19–
32.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.19
4. Beneish,
M. D.,
Billings
M. B.,
and
HodderL. D.
2008.
Internal control weaknesses and information uncertainty.
The Accounting Review83 (
3):
665–
703.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.665
5. Blankespoor,
E.,
deHaan
E.,
and
MarinovicI.
2020.
Disclosure processing costs, investors' information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review.
Journal of Accounting and Economics70 (
2–3):
101344.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101344
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献