Trust but Verify: The Oracle Paradox of Blockchain Smart Contracts

Author:

Albizri Abdullah1,Appelbaum Deniz1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Montclair State University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although research shows that blockchain provides fairly immutable virtual provenance workflows, proof that the blockchain accurately represents physical events lacks truly independent verification. This dilemma, the Oracle Paradox, challenges blockchain architecture and is perhaps one reason why businesses have hesitated to adopt smart contracts. Blockchain proponents claim that people can serve as trusted Oracles in a smart contract. However, auditing research shows that people are the weak link in almost every internal control application, including those pertaining to blockchain. People are susceptible to collusion, bribery, error, and fraud and these tendencies are not entirely mitigated by blockchain technologies (Balagurusamy et al. 2019; Nakamoto 2008). This research proposes a framework to mitigate the paradox of the Oracle: A Business Process Management (BPM) model of a Blockchain Smart Contract-enabled supply chain with IoT as the sole “third-party” Oracle participant, utilizing design science research.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Human-Computer Interaction,Accounting,Information Systems,Software,Management Information Systems

Reference62 articles.

1. Alles, M., and GrayG. L. 2020. “The first mile problem”: Deriving an endogenous demand for auditing in blockchain-based business processes. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems38: 100465.

2. Alzahrani, N. and BulusuN. 2018. Block-Supply Chain: A New Anti-Counterfeiting Supply Chain Using NFC and Blockchain. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems, Munich, Germany, June 15.

3. Ammar, M., Russello G., and CrispoB. 2018. Internet of Things: A survey on the security of IoT frameworks. Journal of Information Security and Applications38: 8– 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2017.11.002

4. Appelbaum, D., and NehmerR. 2020. Auditing cloud-based blockchain accounting systems. Journal of Information Systems34 ( 3): 5– 21.

5. Asolo, B. 2018. Blockchain Oracles explained. Available at: https://www.mycryptopedia.com/blockchain-Oracles-explained/

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3