Cyber Supply Chain Risk Management: Toward an Understanding of the Antecedents to Demand for Assurance

Author:

Hampton Clark1,Sutton Steve G.23ORCID,Arnold Vicky23,Khazanchi Deepak4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of South Carolina

2. Norwegian School of Economics

3. University of Central Florida

4. University of Nebraska at Omaha

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recognizing the need for effective cyber risk management processes across the supply chain, the AICPA issued a new SOC in March 2020 for assuring cyber supply chain risk management (C-SCRM) processes. This study examines supply chain relationship factors and cyber risk issues to better understand the demand for C-SCRM assurance. Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition provides the conceptual foundation for assessing the dual drivers of relationship building and cyber risk management on demand for assurance. We use a field survey to collect data from 205 professionals enabling evaluation of the complex relationships in the theoretical model. Results support all hypotheses, provide satisfactory model fit, and support the underlying theory. Trust and cyber supply chain risk both positively influence demand for assurance over C-SCRM processes. This study expands the literature on cyber assurance by auditors and elaborates on overall supply chain processes that help drive value from auditors providing such assurance.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Human-Computer Interaction,Accounting,Information Systems,Software,Management Information Systems

Reference86 articles.

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2020 a. SOC for Supply Chains Backgrounder. New York, NY: AICPA.

2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2020 b. Appendix A: Information for Management . New York, NY: AICPA.

3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2020 c. Appendix B: Comparison of SOC for Supply Chain, SOC 2, and SOC for Cybersecurity Examinations and Related Reports. New York, NY: AICPA.

4. Anderson, S., and LanenW. 2002. Using electronic data interchange (EDI) to improve the efficiency of accounting transactions. The Accounting Review77 ( 4): 703– 729. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.703

5. Armstrong, C., and SambamurthyV. 1999. Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Information Systems Research10 ( 4): 304– 327. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.304

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3