Affiliation:
1. University of Notre Dame
Abstract
ABSTRACT
I use a novel decomposition to estimate information and bias components from the returns implied by analyst price targets and provide evidence that prices simultaneously under-react to information and over-react to bias. Price reactions to information are permanent, and prices drift in the direction of their initial reaction for up to 12 months. Price reactions to bias are transitory, and prices reverse their initial reaction after about three months. Price reactions are relatively efficient. Approximately 85 percent of the total price reaction to information occurs during price target announcement months. Market participants are able to mostly (but not fully) debias analyst-expected returns before incorporating them into prices, with the announcement-month reaction to bias being relatively weak at about 15 percent of its reaction to information. A trading strategy analysis implies that mispricing induced by bias is only about one-third of that implied by prior research.
JEL Classifications: G12; G14; G40.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference54 articles.
1. Do analyst conflicts matter? Evidence from stock recommendations;Agrawal,;The Journal of Law and Economics,2008
2. Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects;Amihud,;Journal of Financial Markets,2002
3. Information content of equity analyst reports;Asquith,;Journal of Financial Economics,2005
4. The impact of split adjusting and rounding on analysts’ forecast error calculations;Baber,;Accounting Horizons,2002
5. Bali,
T. G.
, J.Hu, and S.Murray. 2017. Option implied volatility, skewness, and kurtosis and the cross-section of expected stock returns. Georgetown University (Working paper). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2322945