Affiliation:
1. University of Waterloo
2. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
3. Norwegian Center for Taxation
4. University of Saskatchewan
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Using confidential data from the Internal Revenue Service on who signs a corporation's tax return, we investigate whether the party primarily responsible for the tax compliance function of the firm—the auditor, an external non-auditor, or the internal tax department—is related to the corporation's tax aggressiveness. We report three key findings: (1) firms preparing their own tax returns or hiring a non-auditor claim more aggressive tax positions than firms using their auditor as the tax preparer; (2) auditor-provided tax services are related to tax aggressiveness even after considering tax preparer identity, which supports and extends prior research using tax fees as a proxy for tax planning; and (3) Big 4 tax preparers, in particular, are linked to less tax aggressiveness when they are the auditor than when they are not the auditor. Our findings help policymakers and researchers better understand an important feature of tax compliance intermediaries; particularly, how the dual role via audits is related to observable corporate tax outcomes.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference65 articles.
1. An empirical investigation of audit fees, nonaudit fees, and audit committees;Abbott;Contemporary Accounting Research,2003
2. Alvarez & Marsal. 2012. CFO Matters: Tax Perspectives Survey Highlights. Available at: http://warrington.ufl.edu/accounting/docs/tn.pdf
3. The incentives for tax planning;Armstrong;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2012
4. Making the outsourcing relationship work;Brown;International Tax Review,2002
5. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?;Chen;Journal of Financial Economics,2010
Cited by
125 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献