Abstract
ABSTRACT
We study optimal disclosure via two competing communication channels: hard information whose value has been verified, and soft disclosures such as forecasts, unaudited statements, and press releases. We show that certain soft disclosures may contain as much information as hard disclosures, and we establish that: (1) exclusive reliance on soft disclosures tends to convey bad news, (2) credibility is greater when unfavorable information is reported, and (3) misreporting is more likely when soft information is issued jointly with hard information. We also show that a soft report that is seemingly unbiased in expectation need not indicate truthful reporting. We demonstrate that mandatory disclosure of hard information reduces the transmission of soft information, and that the aggregation of hard with soft information will turn all information soft.
JEL Classifications: D72; D82; D83; G20.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference56 articles.
1. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers;Ball;Journal of Accounting Research,1968
2. The effect of audit quality on earnings management;Becker;Contemporary Accounting Research,1998
3. Using privileged information to manipulate markets: Insiders, gurus, and credibility;Benabou;Quarterly Journal of Economics,1992
4. Bertomeu, J.,
J. H. Evans,
M. Feng, and A. Tseng.
2015. Tacit Collusion and Voluntary Disclosure: Theory and Evidence from the U.S. Automotive Industry. Technical Report. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh.
5. Beyer, A.
2012. Conservatism and Aggregation: The Effect on Cost of Equity Capital and the Efficiency of Debt Contracts. Working paper, Stanford University.
Cited by
97 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献