Client Deadline Concentration in Audit Offices and Audit Quality

Author:

Czerney Keith1ORCID,Jang Daun2,Omer Thomas C.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Missouri

2. California State University–Sacramento

3. University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Abstract

SUMMARY This research investigates the effect on audit quality of concentrated public company financial statement filing deadlines in audit offices. Audit offices must effectively manage their resources to meet clients' audit service requirements. When an audit office has deadlines that are more concentrated in time, effective resource management is of greater importance to reduce the likelihood of audit failure. Drawing on relevant research from the auditing and management literatures, we hypothesize and find that audit quality is lower when an audit office's clients' financial statement deadlines concentrate in time, which we term client deadline concentration. The significant, negative effect of client deadline concentration on audit quality is incremental to the effects of other resource-based constraints from the prior literature and to controls for unobservable differences in audit offices that explain a significant amount of the variation in audit quality outcomes. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42; M48. Data Availability: Data are available from public sources identified in the text.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference63 articles.

1. How do audit workpaper reviewers cope with the conflicting pressures of detecting misstatements and balancing client workloads?;Agoglia;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2010

2. Auditors' perceptions of time budget pressures and premature sign-offs: A replication and extension;Alderman;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,1982

3. Conservatism and auditor-client negotiations;Antle;Journal of Accounting Research,1991

4. Does the culture of the largest audit firms influence their audit quality and efficiency?;Aobdia,2017

5. Banaldi, J. 2018. SEC Comment Letters: A Seven Year Trend. Sutton, MA: Audit Analytics. Available at: https://www.auditanalytics.com/blog/sec-comment-letters-a-seven-year-trend/

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3