The Effect of Increased Audit Disclosure on Managers' Real Operating Decisions: Evidence from Disclosing Critical Audit Matters

Author:

Bentley Jeremiah W.1ORCID,Lambert Tamara A.2,Wang Elaine (Ying)1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Massachusetts Amherst

2. Lehigh University

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate whether and how a “critical audit matter” (CAM) disclosure affects managers' real operating decisions in two contexts (issuing a loan that decreases versus increases the average risk profile of loan portfolios, or choosing to hedge versus speculate on commodity risk). We expect that a CAM disclosure increases disclosure costs and implies expanded auditor support for both types of activities, but we expect implied auditor support to be valued more highly for risk-increasing than for risk-decreasing activities. As a result, we predict that a CAM disclosure decreases managers' risk-decreasing activities (due to increased disclosure costs) more than managers' risk-increasing activities (as the implied auditor support counteracts the increased disclosure costs). We find evidence consistent with our prediction across multiple experiments. Our study sheds light on the unintended consequences of a CAM disclosure and provides insight to relevant parties as the new standard goes into effect.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference65 articles.

1. Agoglia, C. P., Doupnik T. S., and TsakumisG. T. 2011. Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review86 ( 3): 747– 767. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000045

2. Al-Hamadi, H. M. and MuhammedB. J. 2009. Pragmatics: Grice's conversational maxims violations in the responses of some western politicians. Journal of the College of Arts, University of Basrah50: 1– 23.

3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1993. The Expectation Gap Standards: Progress, Implementation Issues, and Research Opportunities, edited byGuy,D., and WintersA. . New York, NY: AICPA.

4. Asay, H. S., Guggenmos R., Kadous K., Koonce L., and LibbyR. 2019. Theory testing and process evidence in accounting experiments. Working paper, The University of Iowa, Cornell University, Emory University, and The University of Texas at Austin.

5. Backof, A. G., Bowlin K., and GoodsonB. M. 2018. The importance of clarification of auditors' responsibilities under the new audit reporting standards. Working paper, University of Virginia, The University of Mississippi, and University of Cincinnati.

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3