The Informational Value of Segment Data Disaggregated by Underlying Industry: Evidence from the Textual Features of Business Descriptions

Author:

Song Shiwon1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. INSEAD

Abstract

ABSTRACT I examine a fundamental determinant of disclosure quality: how underlying data are disaggregated. For this, I create a measure of industry disaggregation, which is the extent to which segment disclosures are disaggregated based on underlying industries. To identify underlying industries, I apply a deep learning algorithm that extracts textual features from Item 1 business descriptions, in which firms are required to accurately describe their products and services. Industry disaggregation captures the disclosure of underlying industries and the adherence to industry-based disaggregation criteria. Consistent with capital markets being informationally segmented by industry, I find that industry disaggregation is negatively associated with analyst forecast error and dispersion, and positively associated with analyst following and information transfers among analysts and investors. These findings indicate that financial information is more informative, and, thus, of higher quality, when disaggregated by standardized criteria that achieve comparability and match the information-processing strategies of capital market participants. Data Availability: Data are available from the sources identified in the paper. JEL Classifications: D89; G14; M41; M48.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference70 articles.

1. Akbulut, M. E., and MatsusakaJ. G. 2010. 50 years of diversification announcements. Financial Review45 ( 2): 231– 262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00245.x

2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1994. Improving Business Reporting—A Customer Focus. Report of the AICPA Special Committee on Financial Reporting. New York, NY: AICPA.

3. Arya, A., and GloverJ. 2008. Performance measurement manipulation: Cherry-picking what to correct. Review of Accounting Studies13 ( 1): 119– 139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9042-3

4. Arya, A., and GloverJ. 2014. On the upsides of aggregation. Journal of Management Accounting Research26 ( 2): 151– 166. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50495

5. Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR). 1993. Financial Reporting in the 1990s and Beyond: A Position Paper of the Association for Investment Management and Research. Prepared by Peter. H. Knutson, Financial Accounting Policy Committee.Charlottesville, VA: AIMR.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3