Sophistication-Related Differences in Investors' Models of the Relative Accuracy of Analysts' Forecast Revisions

Author:

Bonner Sarah E.1,Walther Beverly R.2,Young Susan M.3

Affiliation:

1. University of Southern California.

2. Northwestern University.

3. Emory University.

Abstract

The accuracy of sell-side analysts' forecast revisions is related to a number of factors, including characteristics of the analyst and the age of the forecast. In this study we examine whether there are differences in how sophisticated and unsophisticated investors use these factors to predict the relative accuracy of forecast revisions. We adapt the lens model methodological approach from the judgment and decision-making literature to investigate these differences in an archival setting. Our results suggest that sophisticated investors have greater knowledge overall about the relation of the factors to forecast accuracy. Further, our evidence is consistent with sophisticated investors relying more on the specific factors that provide the most benefits (relative to their costs) for predicting relative forecast accuracy.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference60 articles.

1. Ackerman, P., R. Sternberg, and R. Glaser. 1989. Learning and Individual Differences: Advances in Theory and Research. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Co.

2. Ashton, R. 1982. Human Information Processing in Accounting. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.

3. Ayers, B., and R. Freeman. 2001. Evidence that price leads of earnings increase with analyst following and institutional ownership. Working paper, University of Georgia.

4. Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors

Cited by 82 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Do Capital Markets Punish Managerial Myopia? Evidence from Myopic Research and Development Cuts;Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis;2023-12-06

2. Market Development, Information Diffusion, and the Global Anomaly Puzzle;Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis;2022-07-11

3. Market reactions to voluntary disclosures of a strategic alliance agreement: evidence from China;Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad;2022-04-13

4. Does IFRS experience improve analyst performance?;Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation;2022-03

5. An empirical analysis of experienced reviewers in online communities: what, how, and why to review;Electronic Markets;2021-10-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3