Affiliation:
1. University of Missouri–Columbia.
2. Washington State University.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Larger offices of Big 4 auditors are predicted to have higher quality audits for SEC registrants due to greater in-house experience in administering such audits. We test this prediction by examining a sample of 6,568 U.S. firm-year observations for the period 2003–2005 and audited by 285 unique Big 4 offices. Results are consistent with larger offices providing higher quality audits. Specifically, larger offices are more likely to issue going-concern audit reports, and clients in larger offices evidence less aggressive earnings management behavior. These findings are robust to extensive controls for client risk factors and to controls for other auditor characteristics. While the evidence suggests audit quality is higher on average in larger Big 4 offices, we make no claims that audit quality is unacceptably low in smaller offices.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference45 articles.
1. Altman, E. 1983. Corporate Financial Distress: A Complete Guide to Predicting, Avoiding, and Dealing with Bankruptcy. New York, NY: Wiley.
2. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence;Ashbaugh;The Accounting Review,2003
3. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality;Balsam;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2003
4. The effect of audit quality on earnings management;Becker;Contemporary Accounting Research,1998
5. Becker, G. S. 1993. Human Capital. 3rd edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cited by
792 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献