Affiliation:
1. University of California, Los Angeles.
2. Stanford University.
Abstract
This study investigates the relation between share price and stock-based compensation expense that is disclosed but not recognized under SFAS No. 123, after controlling for net income, equity book value, and expected earnings growth. Our instrumental variables approach controls for the mechanical relation between share price and option values. We find that investors view SFAS No. 123 expense as an expense of the firm, and as sufficiently reliable to be reflected in their valuation assessments. Findings based on annual returns indicate SFAS No. 123 expense reflects on a timely basis changes in investor-perceived costs associated with stock-based compensation.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference35 articles.
1. Market valuation of employee stock options
2. - M. E. Barth, and R. Kasznik. 2003. Do firms understate stock-based compensation expense disclosed under SFAS No. 123? Working paper, Stanford University.
3. Accounting Principles Board (APB). 1973. Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. APB Opinion No. 25. New York, NY: APB.
4. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view
Cited by
160 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献