Affiliation:
1. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2. Lancaster University
3. University of Michigan
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This study addresses whether asset securitizations are really asset sales or a form of secured borrowing, by estimating cross-sectional equity valuation regressions to assess whether the stock market treats securitized assets and liabilities held by a special purpose entity (SPE) as assets and liabilities of the sponsor-originator (S-O). Although all sample firms account for asset securitizations as sales, we find that the market views such SPE assets and liabilities as belonging to the S-O, i.e., the risk and rewards of ownership of the transferred assets reside with the S-O and not the SPE. Our findings are consistent with the explanation that sale-based asset securitizations enable SPE bondholders to retain priority in bankruptcy of the S-O while also enabling the S-O to obtain lower borrowing costs by implicitly guaranteeing the SPE’s debt.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference20 articles.
1. The effects of cross-sectional scale differences on regression results in empirical accounting research;Barth;Contemporary Accounting Research,1996
2. Outstanding U.S. Bond Market Debt;Bond Market Association
3. Characteristics of securitizations that determine issuers’ retention of the risks of the securitized assets;Chen,2007
4. Playing with assumptions to report a rosy future today: The role of corporate governance in the reporting of asset securitizations;Dechow,2004
5. Scale and scale effects in market-based accounting research;Easton;Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,2003
Cited by
76 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献