The Development of AudEx: An Audit Data Assessment System

Author:

Lombardi Danielle R.1,Dull Richard B.2

Affiliation:

1. Villanova University

2. West Virginia University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tools to assist auditors in making sound, complete, and consistent judgements have become increasingly important due to regulation, litigation, and the desire to increase audit effectiveness. Historically, expert systems have been problem specific and created from scratch. Such systems were challenging to update and had limited adaptability when applied to additional problem spaces. If an adaptable system is possible, then costs and time may be reduced related to production, testing, and implementation of quality audit tools. Increased availability of such tools could be a tremendous benefit to auditors. Using a design science research method, this paper describes the process used to create a fraud risk assessment audit tool by embedding audit rules into a generic expert system shell that is widely used in the medical field. The resulting decision and training aid can assist auditors in making fraud risk assessments. While prior research has addressed many components of the issue, the current system was created to address the current risk environment, and a variety of contexts of interest, as the risk environment changes. The system was evaluated by practicing auditors while completing a series of cases. Evaluation results support the benefits of the artifact when used to assist in fraud risk assessments.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Accounting

Reference65 articles.

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).2002. Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99. New York, NY: AICPA.

2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2012. Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. Available at: http://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AU-C-00240.pdf

3. Primacy effects and the role of risk in auditor belief-revision processes;Anderson;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,1999

4. The effect of using diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures on judges' liability judgments;Anderson;Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,1995

5. The effect of client vs. decision aid as a source of explanations upon auditors' sufficiency judgments: A research noted;Anderson;Behavioral Research in Accounting,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3