An Investigation of Ethical Environments of CPAs: Public Accounting versus Industry

Author:

Bobek Donna D.1,Dalton Derek W.2,Daugherty Brian E.3,Hageman Amy M.4,Radtke Robin R.2

Affiliation:

1. University of South Carolina

2. Clemson University

3. University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

4. Kansas State University

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to investigate certified public accountants' (CPAs) perceptions of their ethical environments. More specifically, we compare the perceptions of CPAs in (1) public accounting firms to those in industry, and (2) perceptions of CPAs at Big 4 public accounting firms to those at non-Big 4 firms. The ethical environment is one component of overall organizational culture and is important for encouraging ethical decision making. Based on responses from 904 CPAs, we find CPAs working at public accounting firms perceive their ethical environments as significantly stronger than CPAs in industry (and other nonpublic accounting work settings). Additionally, within public accounting, CPAs at Big 4 firms perceive their ethical environments as significantly stronger than those working at non-Big 4 accounting firms. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Data Availability: Please contact the authors.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Accounting

Reference67 articles.

1. Characteristics of ethical business cultures;Ardichvili;Journal of Business Ethics,2009

2. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). 2014. Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Available at: http://www.acfe.com/rttn/docs/2014-report-to-nations.pdf

3. The factors that affect accountants' decisions to seek careers with Big 4 versus non-Big 4 accounting firms;Bagley;Accounting Horizons,2012

4. Market and political/regulatory perspectives on the recent accounting scandals;Ball;Journal of Accounting Research,2009

5. Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings;Beatty;The Accounting Review,1989

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3