Affiliation:
1. West Virginia University
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Market declines of 2008–2009 and 2022–2023 brought renewed attention to the issue of illiquidity and the attendant costs faced by the stockholders. Margrabe exchange option-based models have been employed widely for estimating the cost of illiquidity (price risk). These models estimate the exchange ratio for two assets where the future price of both assets is unknown. Treating one of the assets as a numeraire, or currency in which the other asset is priced, simplifies the model and makes it easily tractable. Some authors have ignored this distinction, leading to inflated estimates for illiquidity discounts (sometimes exceeding 100 percent, a logical fallacy). In this paper, I present a uniform framework (the Margrabe exchange option) comparing the estimated cost of illiquidity under different information asymmetry assumptions. Empirical results presented are consistent with the theoretical predictions in that the expected rank order for estimated costs under different formulations is preserved.
JEL Classifications: C52; D47; D82; G13; K22.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Computer Science Applications,History,Education,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference53 articles.
1. Estimating the holding period for listed securities;Abbott,;Valuation Strategies,2004
2. Asset pricing with liquidity risk;Acharya,;Journal of Financial Economics,2005
3. Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time series effects;Amihud,;Journal of Financial Markets,2002
4. Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread;Amihud,;Journal of Financial Economics,1986