Does Recent Academic Research Support Changes to Audit Reporting Standards?

Author:

Bédard Jean1,Coram Paul2,Espahbodi Reza3,Mock Theodore J.4

Affiliation:

1. Université Laval

2. The University of Adelaide

3. Washburn University

4. University of California, Riverside

Abstract

SYNOPSIS The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), and the U.K. Financial Reporting Council (FRC) have proposed or approved standards that significantly change the independent auditor's report. These initiatives require the auditor to make additional disclosures intended to close the information gap; that is, the gap between the information users desire and the information available through the audited financial statements, other corporate disclosures, and the auditor's report. They are also intended to improve the relevancy of the auditor's report. We augment prior academic research by providing standard setters with an updated synthesis of relevant research. More importantly, we provide an assessment of whether the changes are likely to close the information gap, which is important to financial market participants and other stakeholders in the audit reporting process. Also, we identify areas where there seems to be a lack of sufficient research. These results are of interest to all stakeholders in the audit reporting process, as the changes to the auditor's report are fundamental. Additionally, our summaries of research on the auditor's report highlight where there is limited research or inconsistent results, which will help academics identify important opportunities for future research.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting

Reference64 articles.

1. Going concern opinion and cost of equity;Amin;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2014

2. Backof, A. G., K. Bowlin, and B. M. Goodson. 2014. The Impact of Proposed Changes to the Content of the Audit Report on Jurors' Assessments of Auditor Negligence. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2446057

3. La justification des appréciations améliore-t-elle la valeur informative du rapport d'audit? Paper presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Francophone Accounting Association;Barde,2014

4. Le paragraphe de justification des appréciations dans le rapport des commissaires aux comptes. Partie 2: Contenu et lisibilité—Théorie et pratique;Bédard;Revue française de comptabilité,2013

5. Bédard, J., and N. Gonthier-Besacier. 2014. Auditor Commentary in the Auditor's Report: An Analysis of the French Experience. Paper presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the French Accounting Association.

Cited by 69 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3