Author:
Earley Christine E.,Hooks Karen L.,Joe Jenifer R.,Polinski Paul W.,Rezaee Zabihollah,Roush Pamela B.,Sanderson Kerri-Ann,Wu Yi-Jing
Abstract
SUMMARY:
On December 17, 2015, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) issued an Invitation to Comment entitled Enhancing Audit Quality in the Public Interest: A Focus on Professional Skepticism, Quality Control and Group Audits (hereafter, the ITC). The ITC highlights the IAASB's discussions regarding the three separate, but related, topics: professional skepticism, quality control, and group audits, in order to solicit feedback on these topics from various stakeholders. The ITC also discusses potential standard-setting activities the IAASB could participate in to enhance audit quality. The comment period ended on May 16, 2016. This commentary summarizes the contributors' views on selected questions posed in the ITC.
Data Availability: The invitation to comment (as of May 23, 2016) is available at: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IAASB-Invitation-to-Comment-Enhancing-Audit-Quality.pdf
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference100 articles.
1. When the PCAOB talks, who listens? Evidence from client firm reaction to adverse GAAP-deficient PCAOB inspection reports;Abbott;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2008
2. The effect of audit review format on review team judgments;Agoglia;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2009
3. Auditors' perceptions of time budget pressures and premature sign-offs: A replication and extension;Alderman;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,1982
4. Common attributes of quality audits;Aldhizer;Journal of Accountancy,1995
5. Multilocation audit risks;Allen;Journal of Applied Business Research,1998
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献