Affiliation:
1. University of Waterloo
2. University of Guelph
3. University of Calgary
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study examines SOX 404 reports with fiscal year-ends between 2004 and 2014 to determine their readability as measured by the FOG Index. We investigate the association between readability and company characteristics, auditor type, opinion type, time period, report content, and report length. We find that the sign and significance of certain associations depend on whether the reports contain material weaknesses. Overall, results show that management's reports are more readable than auditor's reports; longer reports are more readable—contrary to findings for other corporate communications such as 10-Ks; reports of Big 6 firms are less readable than non-Big 6 reports. Interestingly, the Big 4 firms differed in the readability of their reports.
Data Availability: Data are available from sources identified in the text.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Accounting
Reference60 articles.
1. Acito, A. A.,
C. E. Hogan, and A. J. Imdieke.
2014. Auditing Standard No. 2 versus Auditing Standard No. 5: Implications for Integrated Audits and Financial Reporting Quality. Working paper, Michigan State University.
2. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits;Ashbaugh-Skaife;Journal of Accounting & Economics,2007
3. Readability of accounting and auditing messages;Barnett;Journal of Business Communication,1979
4. How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?;Biddle;Journal of Accounting & Economics,2009
5. Bonsall, S.,
A. Leone,
B. Miller, and K. Rennekamp.
2016. A Plain English Measure of Financial Reporting Readability. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2560644
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献