The Benefits of a Relational Approach to Corporate Political Activity: Evidence from Political Contributions to Tax Policymakers

Author:

Brown Jennifer L.1,Drake Katharine1,Wellman Laura1

Affiliation:

1. Jennifer L. Brown is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University, Katharine Drake is an Assistant Professor at The University of Arizona, and Laura Wellman is an Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Empirical evidence linking campaign financing activity to future firm benefits is mixed. However, theory suggests that an important aspect of a successful political strategy is a multi-period investment in cultivating relationships with key policymakers (Snyder 1992). We examine a specific setting and investigate whether firms that invest in relationships with tax policymakers via campaign contributions accrue greater future tax benefits. We find that firms that pursue a more relational approach to corporate political activity have lower future cash and GAAP effective tax rates (ETRs) and less volatile future cash ETRs. Further, we provide evidence of an incremental effect of tax-specific lobbying for firms that develop stronger relationships with tax policymakers via PAC support. Thus, our study links tax-specific PAC support to tax-specific outcomes, providing an economic link for the observed contribution-return relation documented in Cooper, Gulen, and Ovtchinnikov (2010). Data Availability: All data are publicly available from sources as indicated in the text.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Finance,Accounting

Reference64 articles.

1. Corporate political contributions: Investment or agency?;Aggarwal;Business and Politics,2012

2. Measuring rates of return on lobbying expenditures: An empirical case study of tax breaks for multinational corporations;Alexander;Journal of Law and Politics,2009

3. Are PAC contributions and lobbying linked? New evidence from the 1995 Lobby Disclosure Act;Ansolabehere;. Business and Politics,2002

4. Why is there so little money in U.S. politics?;Ansolabehere;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2003

5. Did firms profit from soft money?;Ansolabehere;Election Law Journal,2004

Cited by 76 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Complexity and the Tax Code: A Textual Analysis;Public Finance Review;2024-03-28

2. Exploring Tax Avoidance: A Synthesis of the Literature;SIDREA Series in Accounting and Business Administration;2024

3. Tax-strategy-related words, firm’s ability, and tax avoidance;International Journal of Disclosure and Governance;2023-11-28

4. Corporate Tax Benefits from Hometown-Connected Politicians;The Accounting Review;2023-10-01

5. Corporate political donations and audit fees: Some evidence from Australian audit pricing;International Journal of Auditing;2023-09-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3