Bibliometric Analysis of the MCDM Methods in the Last Decade: WASPAS, MABAC, EDAS, CODAS, COCOSO, and MARCOS

Abstract

In recent years, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques have expanded the corpus of existing techniques and demonstrated their effectiveness with applications in various fields. In this study, bibliometric analysis was conducted to evaluate the research trend on new ranking-based MCDM methods in the last decade, namely WASPAS, MABAC, EDAS, CODAS, COCOSO, and MARCOS. The various keyword combinations were searched on the Web of Science and the Scopus databases. Bibliometric analysis was carried out in R with the Biblioshiny app for the bibliometrix package. In total, 1,215 related publications were analyzed. The sources, authors, countries, and publications were examined in terms of production and total citation, and the most frequent keywords with trend topics were obtained. The summaries of the findings are as follows: The number of publications has increased over the years for all the methods. The most cited studies belong to the authors of the methods and fuzzy implementations related to the methods. For the author's impact and productivity, Zavadskas and Pamučar stand out. Turkey and India rank in the top five in terms of the number of publications produced on all methods. China is the most cited country for the three methods. According to keyword analysis, different research topics such as sustainability, renewable energy, optimization, supplier selection, hydrogen production and transport are investigated through these methods and other techniques are utilized such as SWARA, AHP, TOPSIS, Best-Worst, DEMATEL, MAIRCA, and CRITIC.