Complications profile following regional anesthesia: Comparative analysis between ankle and unilateral spinal blocks for foot surgery

Author:

Aljannare Bashir Garba1,Khalid Abdullahi2,Abdulrahaman Aliyu1,Bello Ibrahim Galadima1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria

2. Department of Surgery, Tetfund Center of Excellence in Urology and Nephrology, Institute of Urology and Nephrology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University and Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria,

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to compare the complications profile between ankle block and unilateral spinal block for foot Surgeries. Ankle block is expected to provide minimal intraoperative and postoperative complications compared to unilateral spinal block following foot surgeries. Material and Methods Fifty adult patients scheduled for elective foot surgeries that met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. They were assigned into two groups of 25 each as they came, group A (ankle block) and group S (unilateral spinal block). Group A had surgery under the ankle block using 4 ml of 0.5% plain bupivacaine to block each nerve. In contrast, group S had surgery under a unilateral spinal block using 3 ml of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine. The complications were observed and recorded. The data obtained were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25.0 and were presented using relevant proportions, tables, and figures. Statistical association tests were performed with a confidence level of 95%, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was taken as significant. Results The intraoperative complications observed between the two groups; three patients (12%) had nausea for group S while two patients (8.7%) had nausea from group A, two patients (8%) had vomiting from group S while one patient (4%) from group A had vomiting, three patients (12%) had bradycardia from group S and one patient (4%) had bradycardia from group A, three patients (12%) from group S had hypotension while no patient had hypotension from group A. The postoperative complications between the two groups; 2 (8%) patients had nausea from group S while only one patient (4%) had nausea from group A, Only 1 (4%) patient had vomiting from group S and one patient (4%) had vomiting from group A. Only two patients (8%) had urinary retention from group S, while no patients from group A had urinary retention. No patient had a postural puncture headache or shivering from group S. Conclusion Ankle block is associated with minimal complications compared to unilateral spinal block.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Reference13 articles.

1. Muric PM;KoChilvers;Pharmacoeconomics of intravenous regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for outpatient surgery. Can J Anesth,1997

2. Peripheral nerve block, clinical Anesthesiology;Morgan,2006

3. A comparative study between unilateral spinal anesthesia versus ultrasound combined femoro-sciatic nerve block for lower limb surgery;Shimaa;Med. J. Cairo Univer,2019

4. Bupivacaine Anesthesia and Intensive care A-Z an encyclopaedia of principle and practice;Steven,2014

5. Comparison of peripheral nerve block, spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia for ambulatory surgery of lower limb;Ozhan;Novel medicus,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3