Inserting the best knee: A short-term analysis of posterior stabilized versus cruciate substituting ultracongruent tibial inserts for total knee replacement

Author:

Rajguhan T. V.1,Vanchi Pravin K.1,Prashanth K. R. Tarun1,Veeraraghavan Raghav R.1,Murugesan Mohan K.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India,

Abstract

Objectives: As the posterior cruciate ligament is a primary stabilizer of the knee, it is functionally replaced using posterior stabilized (PS) or anterior stabilized ultracongruent (UC) inserts in cases where it is attenuated or requires resection. This study compared PS and UC inserts in terms of functional and pain scores in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR). Methods: This prospective randomized study included 90 consecutive patients who underwent total TKR; PS and UC inserts were used in 47 and 43 patients, respectively. Outcomes were measured over 1 year. The duration of surgery was recorded, and the pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale score; functional outcomes were evaluated by assessment of the range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score, and joint stability. All parameters and scores were assessed pre-operatively, immediately post-operative, 1 month, 3 months, and at 1-year follow-up. Results: The groups showed no significant differences and matched similarly in terms of body mass index, sex, or age. At a minimum of 1-year follow-up, TKR using either insert significantly improved the mean ROM and Knee Society and functional scores, which were comparable between the groups. Overall, 14 and 13 patients with UC and PS inserts, respectively, had excellent outcomes; 2 and 1 patients from the PS and UC groups, respectively, were lost to follow-up. Surgery was significantly shorter in the UC group. Although the Visual Analog Scale score had reduced significantly in both groups at the end of 3 months, one patient from the PS group had persistent knee pain with decreased ROM. Conclusion: The inserts showed no significant differences in terms of the ROM and Knee Society and functional scores. Surgery was notably shorter in the UC group (by 5 min). TKR using UC inserts is an effective alternative in patients with small bony geometry and may preserve intercondylar bone.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3