Self-reflection and perception of medical and allied courses faculty to online teaching compared to traditional teaching: A mixed-method study

Author:

YC Nalini1,Raj Jeneth Berlin1,Nithiya Devi R.2,Adkoli Balachandra3,Basavarajegowda Abhishekh4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Puducherry, India,

2. Department of Physiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India,

3. Centre for Health Professions Education, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Puducherry, India,

4. Department of Transfusion Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India,

Abstract

Objectives: Most teachers have minimal experience with online teaching since most of their learning and teaching years have been spent in a traditional face-to-face classroom. So how do instructors prepare themselves to teach online? What are their expectations of this new learning environment for the first time? The nature of faculty preparation and duration of experience affecting the performance between faculty will vary considerably, and support provided for online teaching also vary over a period of time. The objectives of this study were to obtain/ collect the perception of medical and allied course faculty employed at Deemed to be University, Pondicherry, to online teaching compared to traditional teaching. Materials and Methods: The online questionnaire and informed consent were mailed to all the faculty, and they were instructed to rate on a five-point numerically coded Likert scale (Always = 5, Frequently = 4, Sometimes = 3, Seldom = 2 and Never = 1) their satisfaction level to an online lecture class. Preliminary details, such as name, age, gender, department, college and post P.G experience, were obtained. Based on the scoring, inferential analysis was done. The online discussion session was done amongst selective participants, and a thematic analysis of the same was done. Results: A total of 119 participants responded to the questionnaire. An unpaired t-test was applied, and a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) was observed in the 17 questions in the study population between online and traditional lectures. Conclusion: Faculty were overall not satisfied with online lecture classes as they had trouble providing set induction and adequate closure, enabling pupil participation during lecture presentation and time management compared to traditional/conventional lecture classes. Faculty feel that online teaching can continue in the post-pandemic era for a few selectively chosen appropriate topics, and the class duration should be short. A blended approach to learning can be adopted in the future.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Subject

Physiology (medical),Pharmacology,Physiology

Reference22 articles.

1. University instructors' reflections on their first online teaching experiences;Conrad;J Asynchronous Learn Netw (JALN),2004

2. Instructor's orientations towards computer-mediated learning environments;Annand;J Distance Educ,1997

3. Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: An experimental study;Deutskens;Mark Lett,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3