What is the best soft-tissue reference plane to quantify lip change in bimaxillary protrusion cases? A retrospective cohort study

Author:

Nasar Mustafa1,Ferguson Donald J.1,Liaw Johnny Joung-Lin2,Makki Laith1,Vaid Nikhilesh R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthodontics, European University College, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates,

2. 10F No 20 Changchun Rd, Jhongshan District, Taipei City, Taiwan,

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity of five soft-tissue profile planes to actual horizontal lower lip changes following treatment of severe bimaxillary protrusion patients with vertical maxillary excess using extra-alveolar miniscrews. The null hypothesis was no differences in the incremental changes of horizontal lower lip changes from pre-treatment to post-treatment of the five methods compared to actual changes. Materials and Methods: Seventy adults were treated orthodontically with extractions for bimaxillary protrusion and “gummy” smile using extra-alveolar miniscrews. Lower lip horizontal position was assessed with pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms and five commonly used soft-tissue reference lines were used to measure horizontal lower lip treatment change. Results: Compared to actual therapeutic lower lip horizontal retraction (4.38 mm), soft-tissue references Ricketts’ E-line (3.89 mm) and Steiner’s S-line (3.88 mm) demonstrated no statistical difference (P > 0.05) from actual change. The five profile plane measures showed moderately high to high intercorrelations among themselves, but none of them were related to the actual amount of anteroposterior lip change that occurred. None of the five soft-tissue measurements showed a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between subgroups with least and greatest lower lip retraction. Conclusion: Under conditions of maximum lower lip retraction, Rickett’s E-line and Steiner’s S-line were fair measures of horizontal lower lip change. Although actual lower lip change and soft-tissue reference plane changes were correlated poorly, intercorrelations among the five soft-tissue references planes were moderately high. None of the five soft-tissue measurements was able to discriminate (P > 0.05) between treatments with least and greatest lower lip retraction. It may be concluded that Rickett’s E-line and Steiner’s S-line soft-tissue profile references are valid when there is considerable therapeutic retraction (4+ mm) of the lower lip.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Reference20 articles.

1. Psychosocial impact of dental esthetics on quality of life in adolescents;Delcides;Angle Orthod,2009

2. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients;Bowman;Angle Orthod,2000

3. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction: Systematic review and meta-analysis;Almurtadha;J Evid Base Dent Pract,2018

4. Soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with extractions: A systematic review;Janson;Eur J Orthod,2019

5. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions;Kocadereli;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3