Spinal cord infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient’s characteristics, diagnosis accuracy, management, and outcome

Author:

Dokponou Yao Christian Hugues12,Ontsi Obame Fresnel Lutèce12,Takoutsing Berjo23,Mustapha Mubarak Jolayemi24,Nyalundja Arsène Daniel25,Elmi Saad Moussa12,Badirou Omar Boladji Adebayo12,Adjiou Dognon Kossi François de Paule12,Agada Kpègnon Nicaise26,Djimrabeye Alngar12,Bankole Nourou Dine Adeniran27

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco

2. Department of Research, SubSaharan Africa Future Neurosurgeon Association, Cotonou, Bénin

3. Department of Research, Association of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon

4. Faculty of Basic Medical Science, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria

5. Department of Surgery, Catholic University, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Abdou Moumouni University, Niamey, Niger

7. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Clinical Investigation Center, INSERM, Teaching Hospital of Tours, Tours, France

Abstract

Background: Acute spinal cord infarction (SCI) is a rare ischemic vascular lesion. It is difficult to diagnose during the acute phase because the clinical features can vary widely, and the diffusion-weighted imaging of spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often fails to detect any obvious abnormality. The first aim of this study was to describe the SCI patients’ characteristics, evaluate the accuracy of its diagnosis tools and management, and then find the strength of the effect of spinal surgical decompression on the patient’s outcome. Methods: A PubMed keyword and Boolean search using (“spinal cord infarction” OR “spinal cord ischemia” AND diagnosis OR management OR outcome) returned 221,571 results by applying filters. We added 17,400 results from Google Scholar. Fourteen studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis of mean differences. Results: The Time to Nadir was <6 h (56.1%), 6–12 h (30.7%), 12–72 h (5.4%), and more than 72 h (7.8%). The higher proportion of Owl’s eye findings in the MRI was reported at the cervical level (39.6%) and thoracic level (22.9%) P = 0.031. The T2DWI has a moderate accuracy (area under the curve = 0.835) in detecting the T2 hypersignal intensity (T2HSI) at the hyperacute time to NADIR (<6 h). The median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at admission was 3 (2–3), and after a follow-up duration of 12 months (6–15.5), the median mRS was reported to be 1 (1–2). About 68.9% benefited from medical treatment and physiotherapy, whereas spinal surgical decompression was done in 22.8%. Seventy percent of the overall studies favor spinal surgical decompression, with the estimated average standardized mean difference between medical and surgical treatment being = 1.2083 (95% confidence interval: 1.0250–1.3917). Conclusion: The T2DWI has moderate accuracy in detecting the T2HSI at the hyperacute time (NADIR <6 h). Even though surgical decompression favored good outcomes, medical treatment with physiotherapy was mostly used for the management of SCI.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Reference45 articles.

1. Iatrogenic spinal cord injury: An observational study;Alcanyis-Alberola;Spinal Cord,2011

2. Cervical spinal cord ischemic reperfusion injury: A comprehensive narrative review of the literature and case presentation;Algahtani;Cureus,2022

3. Time is spine: A review of translational advances in spinal cord injury;Badhiwala;J Neurosurg,2018

4. Child pial arteriovenous fistula of the conus medullaris presenting with spinal cord venous congestion: Case report and literature review;Bankole;Interdiscip Neurosurg,2021

5. Clinical biomarkers differentiate myelitis from vascular and other causes of myelopathy;Barreras;Neurology,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3