Conflict of interest disclosure and interpretation - rest assured the medical professional in the audience is perceptive, alert and smart

Author:

Parikh Purvish M.1,Narayanan P.2,Vora A.3,Gulia A.4,Mullapally S. K.5,Rangrajan B.6,Gupta S.7,Mehta P.8,Hingmire S.9,Kulkarni P.9,Parekh B.10,Ghadyalpatil N.11,Babu G.12,Singh R.13

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Oncology, Shalby Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India,

2. Department of Medical Oncology, Cytecare Cancer Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India,

3. Department of Medical Oncology, Hope Cancer Clinic, New Delhi, India,

4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India,

5. Department of Medical Oncologist, Aster MIMS, Kannur, Kerala, India,

6. Department of Medical Oncology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India,

7. Department of Medical Oncology, Sarvodaya Hospital Research Center, India,

8. Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology/BMT, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, India,

9. Department of Medical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India,

10. Departments of Medical Oncology, Shalby Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India,

11. Department of Medical Oncology, Yashoda Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India,

12. Department of Medical Oncology, HCG Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India,

13. Department of Medical Oncology, Narayan Superspeciality Hospitals, Gurgoan, Haryana, India,

Abstract

Introduction: We present data from a systematic survey on conflict of interest (COI) disclosure and its interpretation by the doctors participating in continuing medical education (CME). Methods: A brief 12 question online Google survey with multiple choice options (read, select, and click) was done among Indian practicing doctors using links shared through WhatsApp through the internet over a 72 h period. Results: Of the 386 replies, 373 unique replies were eligible for evaluation. The majority found CME activities beneficial. About 73% of participants would watch out for bias, even if the speaker shows COI disclosure slide. The use of brand/trade names was considered as a flag for bias by the majority. About 99% wanted the speaker to show a final take home message slide. Cross verification of the data presented by comparing to published data was done in more than 75% of instances by only 25% of the participating doctors. A significantly higher number of doctors found bias when CME activities were being organized by the health-care industry as compared to programs of medical bodies/societies/organizations. Discussion: COI considerations are given due to the importance of medical professionals. However, doctors are smart enough to understand the limitations of such disclosures and remain alert to ensure they are not influenced by any bias. Take home message slide gives the presenters opportunity to share their insights and allows the audience to make their own judgment on the impartiality of the data presented. The doctors are aware that bias could be more when CME activities are organized by healthcare industry and take appropriate precautions. Conclusion: COI is is given due importance by the medical professionals. COI disclosures are often incomplete. Doctors remain alert to ensure they are not influenced by biased presentations. Concluding take home message slide is unanimously recommended. Presentation bias is more when healthcare industry is directly organizing educational and promotional activities.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Subject

General Medicine

Reference7 articles.

1. Discordance of conflict of interest self-disclosure and the centers of medicare and medicaid services;Cherla;J Surg Res,2017

2. Conflict of interest disclosure slides at the European society of cardiology congress 2016 in Rome: Are they displayed long enough to assess their content? A cross-sectional study;van Lieshout;BMJ Open,2018

3. Available from: https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1RUCY_enAE710AE710&sxsrf=ACYBGNRCkhSH1RZsajhmRA3W3d7yyIyuZQ%3A1569460002847&ei=Ig-MXeO3M9mFyAOLnKDgAw&q=conflict+of+interest+disclosure+slide&oq=conflict+of+interest+disclosure+slide&gs_l=psy-ab.3.0.1317.3205.3557.0.2.0.251.1529.0j6j3.2.0.1.gws-wiz.0i71j35i39j0i20i263j0i8i67j0i22i30.GUwdXUni3sA&ved=0ahUKEwjj0NWPpu3kAhXZAnIKHQsOCDwQ4dUDCAs&uact=5 [Last accessed on 2019 Jul 20]

4. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=conflict+of+interest+disclosure [Last accessed on 2019 Aug 17]

5. Available from: https://www.endocrine.org/~/media/endosociety/files/meetings/endo-2016/endo-2016-tips-for-preparing-title-and-disclosure-slides.pdf?la=en [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 24]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3