Burden of rifampicin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among apparently healthy students at the University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria
-
Published:2023-09-01
Issue:
Volume:8
Page:51-56
-
ISSN:2456-2688
-
Container-title:Journal of Health Science Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JHSR
Author:
Okojokwu Ocheme Julius1, Mawak John Danjuma2, Lawrence Naomi1, Cirfat Nanya Amos1, Shaibu Ahmed Munirat3, Ndubuisi John Chima4, Agabi Yusuf Amuda1, Ali Murna Ahmed1, Anejo-Okopi Joseph Aje5
Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria 2. Department of Biological Sciences, Karl Kumm University, Vom, Plateau State, Nigeria, 3. Department of Microbiology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 4. Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Federal University of Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria 5. Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Health Sciences, Otukpo, Benue State, Nigeria
Abstract
Objectives
As a broad-spectrum antibiotic, rifampicin is used to treat staphylococcal infections. Due to its chemical makeup, it can easily get into tissues and abscesses, which majority of the other antibiotics (anti-staphylococcal drugs) have trouble doing. To treat these infections, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates exhibit rapid evolution of rifampicin resistance, necessitating use of costly medicines. This study, therefore, assessed the burden of rifampicin resistance rate among MRSA in Jos, Nigeria.
Material and Methods
A total of 92 samples were collected from students at the University of Jos. S. aureus was isolated and identified by conventional methods. Susceptibility test was conducted to determine MRSA. After that, the MRSA was challenged with 30 µg of rifampicin using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method.
Results
Out of the 92 samples that were isolated, 45 (48.91%) were from female students, while 47 (51.09%) were from male students. 57 (61.96%) samples were positive for S. aureus. Of the 57 (61.96%) S. aureus isolates recovered, 32 (56.14%) were found to be MRSA. These were subjected to rifampicin, and 18 (56.25%) showed resistance. The susceptibility patterns of S. aureus against antibiotics tested showed a susceptibility of 94.74, 77.19, 75.44, 73.68, 71.93, 64.91, 52.63, 43.86, and 31.58% to ofloxacin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, erythromycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, cefoxitin, and tetracycline, respectively.
Conclusion
It was concluded that MRSA were present in the study population, and a substantial number (56.25%) of these were rifampicin resistant.
Publisher
Scientific Scholar
Reference26 articles.
1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus;Raygada;Int J Infect Dis,2009 2. Rapid detection of mecA-positive and mecA-negative staphylococci by an anti-penicillin binding protein 2a slide latex agglutination test;Hussain;J Clin Microbiol,2005 3. Absence of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates;Olayinka;Afr J Infect Dis,2009 4. The emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a London teaching hospital, 2000–2006;Otter;Clin Microbiol Infect,2010 5. Antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from South Africa;Marais;SAMJ,2009
|
|