Multi-contrast echo-planar imaging sequence (Echo-planar imaging mix) in clinical situations demanding faster MRI-brain scans

Abstract

Objectives: The excellent resolution offered by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a trade-off in the form of scan duration. The purpose of the present study was to assess the clinical utility of echo-planar imaging mix (EPIMix), an echo-planar imaging-based MRI sequence for the brain with a short acquisition time. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of 50 patients, who could benefit from faster MRI brain scans. The T1, T2, fluid attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and T2*/susceptibility-weighted imaging sequences were acquired, conventionally and with EPIMix. Conventional and EPIMix images were assessed by two radiologists for overall quality, motion, and susceptibility artifacts and scored on a Likert scale. The scores given for conventional and EPIMix images were compared. The diagnostic performance of EPIMix was also assessed by the ability to detect clinically relevant findings. Results: The acquisition time for conventional MRI was 11 min and 45 s and for EPIMix 1 min and 15 s. All EPIMix images were sufficient for diagnostic use. On assessment of the diagnostic performance, it was excellent for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Smaller lesions, lesions adjacent to bone, and post-operative tumors were difficult to identify. Moderate to perfect agreement (Kappa values 0.41–1) was seen between radiologists for all categories except skull base, calvarial, and orbital lesions. Image quality, artifact assessment showed excellent interobserver agreement (>90%) for the scores. All EPIMix images showed reduced motion artifacts. The EPIMix-DWI was comparable to conventional-DWI in terms of quality and artifacts. The remaining sequences showed reduced quality and increased susceptibility. Conclusion: The EPIMix has a significantly reduced acquisition time than conventional MRI and could be used instead of conventional MRI in situations demanding faster scans such as suspected acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. In other clinical scenarios, it could help tailor the MRI examination for each patient.