Affiliation:
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
2. Department of Neurosurgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Abstract
Background:Excellent treatment outcomes using a pipeline embolization device (PED) have been reported. However, several limitations exist. For example, patients must receive antiplatelet therapy for at least several months, and few alternative treatments exist except for inserting additional flow diverter stents in cases where aneurysm obliteration is not obtained.Case Description:A 67-year-old female suffered from an asymptomatic large aneurysm of the left paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA). She underwent endovascular coil embolization, but coil compaction was confirmed at 2-year follow-up. A PED was inserted as an additional treatment. Unfortunately, the patient was required to discontinue antiplatelet therapy to undergo orthopedic surgery for her severe osteoarthritis of the knee. However, surveillance imaging performed 2 years after insertion of the PED revealed persistent filling into the aneurysm, and we could not stop the antiplatelet therapy to proceed with orthopedic surgery. Therefore, we performed ICA trapping with extracranial-intracranial high-flow bypass to cease antiplatelet therapy promptly. Antiplatelet therapy was completed 3 months after the rescue surgery, and the patient underwent orthopedic surgery.Conclusion:The authors describe a case of failure of complete obliteration after treatment using a PED, which required cessation of antiplatelet therapy to receive orthopedic surgery. Although safety and efficacy of PED treatment have been reported, we must consider the possibility of other diseases requiring discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy after PED embolization.
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Surgery
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献