Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years

Author:

Musa Gerald1,Barrientos Rossi E.C1,Makirov Serik K.2,Chmutin Gennady E.1,Antonov Gennady I.3,Kim Alexander V.4,Otarov Olzhas5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Diseases and Neurosurgery, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

2. Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Spinal Surgery, Scientific and Technical Center, Family Clinic, Moscow, Russia

3. 3 Central Military Clinical Hospital named after A.A Vishnevsky, of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

4. Department of Neurosurgery, City Clinical Hospital 68 Named after Demihov, Moscow, Russia

5. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Scientific and Technical Center, Family Clinic, Moscow, Russia.

Abstract

Background: Recurrent disc herniations remain a challenge in spinal surgery. Although some authors recommend a repeat discectomy, others offer more invasive secondary fusions. Here, we reviewed the literature (2017–2022) regarding the safety/efficacy of treating recurrent disc herniations with repeated discectomy alone. Methods: Our literature search of recurrent lumbar disc herniations included; Medline, PubMed, Google scholar, and the Cochrane database. We focused on the types of discectomy performed, perioperative morbidity, costs, length of surgery, pain scores, and incidence of secondary dural tears. Results: We identified 769 cases that included 126 microdiscectomies, and 643 endoscopic discectomies. Rates of disc recurrence ranged from 1% to 25% with accompanying secondary durotomy varying from 2% to 15%. In addition, operative times were relatively short, ranging from 29.2 min to 125 min, with a relatively small average estimated blood loss (i.e., minimal to maximally 150 mls). Conclusion: Repeated discectomy was the most commonly performed treatment for same-level recurrent disc herniations. Despite minimal intraoperative blood loss and short operating times, there was a significant risk of durotomy. Notably, patients must be informed that more extensive bone removal for treating recurrent disc increases the risk for instability warranting subsequent fusion.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

Reference10 articles.

1. Lumbar revision microdiscectomy in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A single-center prospective series;Ahsan;Surg Neurol Int,2020

2. Comparison of the outcomes of microendoscopic discectomy versus full-endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of L4/5 lumbar disc herniation;Fujita;Global Spine J,2022

3. Endoscopic surgery for recurrent disk herniation after microscopic or endoscopic lumbar diskectomy;Goker;Turk Neurosurg,2020

4. Clinical outcome of biportal endoscopic revisional lumbar diskectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation;Kang;J Orthop Surg Res,2020

5. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy and open lumbar microdiskectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation;Lee;J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3