Current status of implementation of trauma registries’ in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation

Author:

Cote Maria P.1,Hamzah Radzi2,Alty Isaac G.23,Tripathi Isita2,Montalvan Adriana4,Leonard Sophia M.4,Kamble Jyoti5,Javed Saad6,Asturias Sabrina7,Khajanchi Monty8,Raykar Nakul P.23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2. Programme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

3. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

4. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

5. Department of Public Health, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India

6. Health Services Academy, Ministry of National Health Services Regulations & Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

7. Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Roosevelt Hospital, Guatemala City, Guatemala

8. Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Abstract

Background & objectives Many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) have attempted to implement trauma registries with varying degrees of success. This study aimed to understand the registry implementation mechanism in LMICs better. Study objectives include assessment of the current use of trauma registries in LMICs, identification of barriers to the process and potential areas for intervention, and investigation of the registry implementation experience of key stakeholders in LMICs. Methods An initial narrative review of articles on trauma registry use in LMICs published in English between January 2017 and September 2023 was conducted. Key findings identified in this review were used to establish a theoretical framework from which an interview guide was subsequently developed. Expert consultation with key stakeholders in trauma registry implementation in two LMICs was conducted to assess the experience of registry implementation further. Results The presence of trauma registries in LMICs is limited. Key implementation barriers include funding concerns, uncoordinated administrative efforts, lack of human and physical resources (i.e., technology, equipment), and challenges in data management, analysis, and quality. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the importance of trauma registry development but echoed some obstacles, notably funding and data collection barriers. Interpretation & conclusions Barriers to registry implementation are ubiquitous and may contribute to the low uptake of registries in LMICs. One potential solution to these challenges is the application of the WHO International Registry for Trauma and Emergency Care. Future studies examining context-specific challenges to registry implementation and sustained utilization are required.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3