Saudi orthopedic surgeons’ knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

Author:

Binown Khalid A.1,Alhabradi Faisal A.2,Aljahani Abdulrahman M.3,Shadid Abdulaziz M.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,

3. College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,

4. College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of orthopedic surgeons practicing in Saudi Arabia regarding surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on certified and under-training orthopedic surgeons registered in the Saudi Council for Health Specialties. An email, including an online validated self-administered survey using a voluntary response sampling technique, was sent between November 2020 and January 2021. The questionnaire comprised 12 questions that tested knowledge regarding SAP, five questions that analyzed surgeon attitudes toward SAP, and three questions on SAP-related practice. Results: This study included 271 orthopedic surgeons from different areas of Saudi Arabia. The majority of respondents were registrars (or equivalent) (n = 92; 33.9%), and most of them were male (n = 257; 94.8%). Almost 95% of respondents reported that SAP was indicated for internal fixation, spinal surgeries, and prosthetic joint replacement. Moreover, 82.7% of the respondents stated that cefazolin was considered the first-line SAP. Almost 85% of the respondents demonstrated a positive attitude toward SAP, with a mean score of 2.48. However, 87.5% of them believed that adhering to SAP general guidelines would reduce the rate of infection in orthopedic surgeries. Almost 53% of respondents reported using only one guideline as a reference in their surgical practice. Moreover, 41.3% of surgeons switched between guidelines depending on the surgery. Conclusion: This study revealed adequate knowledge and a positive attitude toward SAP among orthopedic surgeons. However, a discrepancy in the practice habits of orthopedic surgeons was observed, which is explained by non-adherence to SAP protocols. Common guidelines that can be used by all orthopedic surgeons need to be developed and implemented to reduce surgical site infections and non-adherence to SAP protocols. This task can be done by a general trusted body like the Saudi Orthopedic Association.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Reference29 articles.

1. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. Hospitals 2002;Klevens;Public Health Rep,2007

2. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: Attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs;Kirkland;Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,1999

3. Risk of surgical site infection in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery;Ercole;Rev Lat Am Enfermagem,2011

4. Infection in orthopedic implant surgery, its risk factors and outcome;Khan;J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad,2008

5. Surgical site infections in orthopedic patients: Prospective cohort study;Maksimovic;Croat Med J,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3